Protecting clinical intent in the age of AI

Why trust, accuracy, and workflow fit will define the future of healthcare documentation.
Published October 7, 2025
Written by
Picture of Jordan Leibovitz
Marketing Program Manager

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming a practical tool that can reshape how clinicians document care. In a recent HIMSS webinar, preserving clinical intent with powerful healthcare AI, Joseph Tutera, CEO of CarePilot, and Steven H. Rube, MD, Chief Medical Officer at IMO Health explored both the opportunities and challenges of deploying AI at the point of care. 

At its core, the conversation returned to one idea: clinical intent must be preserved. Documentation that loses specificity creates downstream risks, from coding errors and missed reimbursements to compromised patient safety. 

Why specificity matters in clinical documentation 

Rube emphasized that “the most accurate way to capture clinical intent is going to be at the point of care… After that, it’s a game of operator – it loses integrity as it goes down the line.” He pointed to diabetes as an example: a vague diagnosis can disrupt care coordination, compromise patient safety, and significantly increase costs for health systems in risk-adjusted payment models. 

Tutera added that specificity is “patient safety and financial accuracy,” but acknowledged the burden this places on clinicians. AI’s promise, he noted, is reducing that cognitive load by shifting clinicians from “copywriters” of documentation to “copy editors” of AI-generated notes. 

Building (and protecting) clinician trust 

Accuracy, however, is non-negotiable. As Rube explained, “Our gut instinct is that as we see hallucinations and errors, we begin to be very reluctant… we can’t do the 80/20 rule in medicine. We shoot for 100% accuracy.” 

Tutera agreed, underscoring that trust is cumulative: “A few sloppy mistakes will outweigh a lot of wins.” Transparency about system limitations, straightforward onboarding, and highlighting areas of low confidence are all crucial for adoption. 

Reducing errors in AI outputs 

One major theme was the importance of grounding AI in trusted clinical terminology. Tutera explained that hallucinations happen when models lack context, but anchoring them in IMO Health’s clinical terminology can reduce those risks: “Those hallucinations happen by not guiding the system with either clear enough instructions or grounding them in enough context.” 

Rube presented a real-world scenario: “If I say, ‘How’s your diabetes?’ the word itself is meaningless in medicine… But if the system has context from the chart, it can capture the full diagnosis and not hallucinate.” 

Lightening the load for clinicians 

Despite limitations, both speakers stressed the upside. Tutera reported that CarePilot saves providers an average of 78 minutes per day in documentation. Longer, more complete notes not only meet regulatory and payer requirements but also restore clinicians’ ability to focus on patients. 

Rube shared an anecdote from his own care experience; for the first time, his physician said he could go home without a stack of notes to finish. “When ambient works,” Rube said, “the impact on lifestyle is dramatic.” 

The future of clinical documentation and AI 

Both leaders agreed we are at an inflection point. For AI to deliver lasting value, it must fit seamlessly into workflows, integrate tightly with electronic health records (EHRs), and adapt to clinicians’ styles rather than forcing radical changes. 

As Rube summarized, “These emerging technologies must fit in seamlessly to what our goal is here – quality and efficient healthcare… If it doesn’t make sense from a workflow point of view, no one’s going to use it.” 

Healthcare leaders are at a crossroads: will AI lighten the clinical burden or deepen it? The answer depends on how intentionally we design, ground, and deploy these tools. Click here for the full replay.

Related Content

Blog digest signup

Resources sent straight to your inbox.

Latest Resources​

A cluttered medical problem list fuels clinician fatigue. Smarter tools can keep it clean, accurate, and useful to ease the burden of...
Learn how Frederick Health dramatically decreased problem list clutter and improved accuracy with IMO Core, enhancing provider trust and patient care.
Payers, providers, and payviders all share in the risks and responsibilities of expanding RADV audits. Is your organization ready for what’s next?
ICYMI: BLOG DIGEST

The latest insights and expert perspectives from IMO Health

In your inbox, twice per month.