Clinical Trials
Activate clinical trials at the point of care
fail to meet their initial enrollment and timeline targets
IMO Health activates trial inclusion and exclusion criteria within the EHR to accelerate timelines, reduce manual review, and minimize false positives.
Ground feasibility in live clinical reality
Deliver real-time, protocol-aligned patient counts inside the EHR to improve site performance confidence.
Enable sites in weeks, not months
Deploy EHR-native filters with minimal setup and no custom builds, enabling live alerts and coordinator patient lists from day one.
Identify true trial-eligible patients at documentation
Find eligible patients during documentation, not weeks later – reducing screen failures and downstream corrections with point-of-care precision logic.
Move beyond retrospective abstraction and activate research-grade precision directly at the point of care, from feasibility through database lock.
[ FAQS ]
Still have questions? Let's get them answered.
Click to explore our clinical trials FAQs or contact us if you don’t see yours. We’re happy to help.
What makes patient identification more accurate and consistent across trial sites?
IMO Health operates at the level of clinician-authored documentation, not just billing codes. By capturing clinical intent at the point of care and comparing documentation against trial needs, inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied consistently across sites and EHR systems.
This precision logic dramatically reduces false positives and cuts manual CRC chart review, significantly improving signal quality while preserving sensitivity to true eligible patients.
How does IMO Health standardize inclusion and exclusion logic inside the EHR?
Protocol criteria are translated into structured, versioned value sets – groups of precision terminology – that activate directly within existing clinical workflows. Eligibility logic runs at documentation, not weeks later through retrospective abstraction, ensuring consistent application across sites. Because logic is tied to normalized terminology rather than local coding habits, variability in documentation does not translate into variability in eligibility across physicians, patients, or sites.
How does terminology improve eligibility alignment and cohort reproducibility?
ICD-10–CM level identification often lacks the granularity required for precise trial eligibility. IMO Health captures clinician-authored terms and maps them across SNOMED CT®, ICD-10-CM, RxNorm®, LOINC®, MedDRA, and more using a single normalized identifier. This preserves clinical meaning, aligns cohorts tightly to protocol intent, and creates transparent, auditable lineage, making feasibility estimates, enrollment cohorts, and downstream analyses reproducible across studies.
How does the solution work across different EHR systems and site configurations?
IMO Health works with and deploys using EHR-native flat files with minimal configuration and no custom builds. Trial logic activates inside existing workflows, regardless of EHR vendor, with in-EHR alerts and CRC patient lists available from day one. Structured, normalized data can flow directly from EHR to EDC with version control and full traceability, enabling multi-site, multi-EHR trials to scale without additional IT burden.